Who watches the Watchmen? A review of Zack Snyder's Watchmen
- 07 March 2009
- Gerard Wood
Watchmen is a remarkable movie, and almost entirely for the right reasons. Zack Snyder has achieved what only Chris Nolan (Batman Begins, The Dark Knight) has managed before him: a thought-provoking, disturbing, hard hitting superhero extravaganza, unafraid of dealing with moral complexity and unflinching in the face of ugly truths.
This is all the more remarkable given the opinion of many that Alan Moore and Dave Gibbons' Hugo Award winning graphic novel Watchmen was pretty much unfilmable, due as much to its complexity as its contrary nature: the existence of superheroes is probably the start and end of any similarity between Watchmen and most anything else emerging from DC Comics and Marvel. Set against an otherwise familiar real world backdrop, Watchmen takes a sledge-hammer to the concept of the superhero and from the shattered pieces builds something plausible. But it’s not at all pretty. Moore and Gibbons have a grim and cynical view of things, and if at the end of the day (or the world for that matter) there is a sliver of hope for us, they seem to believe that it will only be achieved at a huge cost. In Batman Begins, and more so with The Dark Knight, Chris Nolan takes us a little way down a path that considers similar issues: what does it mean for an individual to assume the role of masked vigilante; what would it mean for the world at large if superheroes did exist? Watchmen, on the other hand, takes us all the way to the disillusioned end of the road, adding a cynical twist to these questions: what, for example, would it mean for the world at large if superheroes did exist and they could be exploited by powerful political forces?
In Watchmen’s alternate reality it is 1985 and President Nixon has achieved a fifth term in office thanks to an American public grateful for victory in Vietnam, a victory that was achieved through the willing assistance of superheroes; the world is in the grip of the Cold War and all that stops things from going nuclear is Dr Manhattan, who is the closest thing to god on earth. And he’s an American. The American Dream has come true, and it’s a bloody nightmare. Snyder’s movie kicks off in spectacular fashion with the murder of The Comedian, a brutal, burnt out and cynical member of the outlawed superhero organisation, the Watchmen. Fellow vigilante and socio-path, Rorschadt, takes up an investigation into the mysterious death.
If you’ve read the graphic novel, you know that this is heading inexorably toward Armageddon; if you haven’t read it, you really don’t want to know any more of the plot than this before seeing the film!
Throughout, Watchmen presents a bleak and sadly believable assessment of the human species as its own worst enemy. The sobering impression the movie leaves behind is that if we are to be saved from ourselves, salvation won’t come from enlightened self-interest, but through exploitation of our basest instincts: we might just stop destroying ourselves if we can unite against a common enemy. Moore, Gibbons and now Snyder seem to be saying that the only way we could be saved from ourselves is if we’re dragged to the brink of self-annihilation.
So, what of the superheroes themselves? To understand them we only have to look at the contrast between their masked and costumed selves and their “normal” alter-egos. Snyder has drawn some criticism for the uneven pacing of his movie, and it’s true that when the superheroes remove their masks and attempt to live “normal” lives, the momentum is lost. But this is heavy with irony. When the Watchmen remove their costumes, we discover social outcasts, men and women incapable of relating to others and barely able to relate to each other. Only when they are masked or costumed do they have any real substance. In fact, in most cases, unless they are actively and brutally kicking arse, they are only half alive.
And here the moral complexity of the material comes in to its own.
Standing up to be counted in the fight against Evil has dire consequences for these exceptional individuals. If they’re not already dysfunctional as a result of their upbringing, they become dysfunctional through their stand against Evil. By placing themselves in the frontline they come face to face with the worst in humanity, and over time they come only to see the worst in humanity. A little longer, and they only believe the worst of humanity. With few, if any exceptions, they become brutal, cynical and ruthless killers, with little or no compassion, as capable of acts of evil as the forces they confront. Over time it becomes hard to differentiate them from the very thing they exist to fight.
There are layers of significance to the term "Watchmen", mostly related to watching and watches, but the one that resonates most is an ironic twist to a classical idea given by Dr Manhattan. The beauty and precision of the clockwork watch implies the existence of a watchmaker, as such a complex creation is clearly not an accident. Theologians have extended this notion to imply the existence of a creator of the universe, God: the universe too has been perceived as a thing of clockwork precision and beauty, and it is surely not an accident, but rather the creation of a thinking mind.
So if the Watchmen watch over us, who watches over the Watchmen? These exceptional individuals are surely no accident. By the closing credits, I think we're left in no doubt: no one watches over. In Moore and Gibbons' universe, there is no maker, it is a universe of chance, devoid of moral guidance.
No movie release in 2011 was more misunderstood and unfairly...
Rather than giving a blow-by-blow breakdown of the narrative...
If you've seen the six minute prologue to Chris Nolan’s The ...
Director Zack Snyder is best known for his stylistic comic b...
My enthusiasm for Marvel’s Thor took a bit of a battering af...
Featured articles
08 Jul 2010
Almost any time we write anything about Neil Gaiman, you can be sure that someone will feel the need to post a comment “outing” the man as a Scientologist. While we have a fairly relaxed attitude to comments and will publish almost anything that contributes to an article, you won’t find many comments about Neil Gaiman’s alleged ties to the Church of Scientology published on this site. We simply... Read more
07 Jun 2010
Finally having had the opportunity to watch Nicholas Winding Refn’s Valhalla Rising, I now appreciate why it was received so well at film festivals and yet failed to get a wide theatrical release. It’s hard going. On one hand it’s almost unbearably brutal and on the other it is layered with the sort of mind-bending symbolic meaning that leads the viewer to the brink of utter confusion and leaves... Read more
02 Aug 2011
Dan Simmons’ latest novel, Flashback (July 2011), is “[a] provocative novel set in a future that seems scarily possible,” proving “why Dan Simmons is one of our most exciting and versatile writers." So says the publicist anyway. Dan Simmons is one of our most exciting and versatile writers, but sadly Flashback doesn’t prove that. And yes, Flashback is a provocative novel, but it doesn’t... Read more
10 Mar 2012
I have a confession to make. I'm not proud of it, but there's no use trying to hide it any longer, the damage has already been done. I was an Apple fanatic. Hard core. Completely obsessed. I'm not proud of my behaviour. I have no real excuses. All I can say in my defense is that I have always been a gadget fan, so naturally I was ripe for the plucking. My psyche was compromised, wide open to the fruit... Read more
16 Oct 2007
Daren Aronofsky’s The Fountain is a movie that divides opinion. During its press screening at the 63rd Venice International Film Festival in September 2006 it was booed; at the public screening the following evening it received a 10 minute standing ovation. To get an idea of just how divided opinion is, take a look at Rotten Tomatoes, a website that rates movies based on published reviews. Of 181... Read more
05 Oct 2009
Science fiction authors have long been outcasts from the literary world, in some cases critics using the worst examples of the genre as ammunition against it. Unfortunately though, at times even science fiction authors themselves can turn on their own kind: "Science fiction is rockets, chemicals and talking squids in outer space,” mocked Margaret Atwood (The Guardian, 28 January 2009), one of her... Read more
30 Jan 2012
If you own an iPhone 4S you may have impressed your friends (or perhaps not) with the built in, voice-driven personal assistant called Siri. You can ask it to book appointments, call people, search nearby restaurants, make calculations, and a great deal more. Most of the time it gets it right too. Now Siri has an Android rival called Evi, and if first impressions are anything to go by, it's an impressive... Read more
19 Oct 2011
After watching the pilot to Fox’s ambitious TV time travelling dinosaur fest called Terra Nova, I am praying that when I watch the next episode the entire cast gets eaten by dinosaurs (in fact, that hope is the only reason I’ll be able to sit through another one). The entire cast’s gruesome deaths at the hands of a frenzied T-Rex or a velociraptor having a bad day can’t come soon enough.... Read more
25 Mar 2012
No movie release in 2011 was more misunderstood and unfairly maligned as a result of misunderstanding than Zack Snyder’s Sucker Punch. Odds are you’ll disagree with that statement. An indication of the movie’s reception by “audiences” (non-professional reviewers) and the critics can be found on Rotten Tomatoes, where audience approval is calculated to be 47%, and of the 196 critical reviews... Read more
09 Dec 2007
After 25 years since its original release, a definitive version of Ridley Scott's science fiction masterwork Blade Runner, Blade Runner: The Final Cut, has arrived. So what exactly has changed? And is it worth all the fuss? After attending a recent screening I can report that there are significant differences, mainly improvements, between this new version and Ridley's first Director's Cut released... Read more
Latest videos
![]() | ![]() |


















![Men In Black 3 Trailer 2 Official 2012 [1080 HD] - Will Smith, Tommy Lee Jones](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Y2r9AIfYcV8/0.jpg)



![Looper - Official Trailer [HD]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/UZyZWFYyxcU/0.jpg)

![Total Recall 2012 Official Trailer [HD]: Colin Farrell Recalls His Dangerous Past: ENTV](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/sWMhADqlPYg/0.jpg)



Re: Scott Bakula and Dean Stockwell to cameo in Quantum Leap movie
Some remakes are ok becausecof improvements in special...
Re: Chronicles of Riddick 3: Dead Man Stalking - Science Fiction World
What, Riddick became Lord Marshall and now hes...
Re: Rotten Apple: the war on Google's Android - Science Fiction World
That will be the legacy of Steve "Palpatine"...
Re: GodMachine
Strange...but cool. Definitely not EFC related in any...