Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows delivers for the fans
- 22 November 2010
- Gerard Wood
No surprises here: Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part One has routed the opposition in its first weekend, raking in US$330 million globally, $125 million in the US alone. In Britain, film 7 (and ¾?) in the Potter franchise smashed the previous record for an opening weekend held by Quantum of Solace with a remarkable $28 million. In terms of Box Office takings alone it appears that director David Yates will top off the Harry Potter saga in a positively epic manner. Given the enthusiasm for Part 1, Part 2, due in July 2011, is sure to leapfrog these remarkable results.
Deathly Hallows takes up the adventure of Harry Potter in the wake of Dumbledore’s death and the revelation that Lord Voldemort has shattered his soul into seven pieces, concealing them in virtually indestructible objects. While any of these so-called horcruxes remain intact, the Dark Lord cannot be destroyed. Harry has been left with the seemingly impossible task of locating and destroying the horcruxes before the inevitable final confrontation with Lord Voldemort.
And the Deathly Hallows themselves? Three objects of great power, the Resurrection Stone (a stone with the power to recall the dead to the world of the living), the Elder Wand (reputedly an unbeatable wand), and an infallible Invisibility Cloak. Voldemort, who has failed to kill Harry time and again, searches for the Elder Wand believing that it will succeed where other wands have failed, but in his arrogance he fails to appreciate the significance of the Hallows.
Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows is not a movie for everyone, and certainly not for some of our more weighty critics who complain with apparent surprise that the Potter movies just aren’t fun anymore, that they’re too grim and lack the levity of the earlier episodes. One can only assume that they’re unfamiliar with Rowling’s novels or fail to appreciate that the grimness of Rowling's world was always there, it’s just that the children are now young adults and perceive the world as it is.
In fact it is quite likely that these critics of the film are not numbered amongst the many millions who are familiar with Rowling’s books. More so than any other book-to-film adaptation I can think of, enjoyment of the Potter movies has relied on the audience's familiarity with the source material. For those unfamiliar with Rowling's narrative, the films must appear somehow incomplete. Screenwriter Steve Kloves has worked on five of the six previous movies (all except Order of the Phoenix) and his handling of Rowling’s material has gone from strength to strength, as has his appreciation of what can be left out of the big screen adaptation: Kloves has become an expert in identifying which gaps in the narrative the fans of the Potter books will readily fill in.
The irony, of course, is that even though Kloves' adaptation of The Deathly Hallows is given the luxury of two movies, it is even more dependent on the assumed knowledge of the audience. Rowling’s novel is immense. For the first time the bulk of the story takes place outside the familiar walls of Hogwarts School of Magic and Rowling introduces us to a far more expansive world. But more significantly the narrative is complex, with many threads carried through from the preceding novels that need to be resolved. So much is missing or compressed in the adaptation that only those in the know can truly enjoy the film, actively filling in the gaps that for everyone else must appear to be gaping holes. [SPOILER ALERT] A good example is Ron’s change of heart under the evil influence of a horcrux which turns him against Harry. In the novel this comes about over an extended period with considerable attention given to it, almost all of which is absent from the movie. So much so that anyone unfamiliar with the novel should be surprised by the apparent ease with which Ron turns on Harry.
Increasingly the Potter films are intended exclusively for the fans of the books. Fortunately for the filmmakers there are a lot of us. None of the later films could stand alone and they’re increasingly reliant on the audiences’ familiarity with Rowling’s writing. Is this good adaptation? Possibly not, but I have no doubt that Yates and Kloves know exactly what they’re doing and how fortunate they are to have such a large and knowledgeable audience: if they’ve taken shortcuts with the adaptation, they’ve done so with skill and fully aware that the bulk of the audience is bringing the missing elements with them.
When the critics dismiss Deathly Hallows for its apparent lack of motivating or profound themes they forget that Rowling is first and foremost an outstanding story-teller. There are in fact weighty themes at play in her series but when all is said and done this saga is a plot driven narrative, an adventure no less: the Potter series is great story telling, not great literature. Something similar could be said of the movie adaptations: they're not great films, but they are great entertainment. What the intended audience is looking for is the enactment on screen of a beloved adventure and the resolution of a thrilling saga, and that is what we get. For many adults, like myself, who have happily shared the journey with the young adult audience the author had in mind when she wrote Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone, this is the movie we have been waiting for: the suitably dramatic and exciting conclusion to an ever more realistically grim fantasy.
Highly recommended for fans of Rowling's novels.
Part 2 is due in July 2011, possibly also in 3D if Warner Brothers can successfully convert it. I’ll be seeing it in 2D…
Here is the first official trailer:
If you’re familiar with Jonathan Stroud’s Bartimaeus Trilogy...
Well, it’s finally over. Ten years in the making, the Harry ...
A new behind the scenes featurette for Harry Potter and the ...
If you haven't heard about I Am Number Four consider this a ...
Featured articles
07 Jun 2010
Finally having had the opportunity to watch Nicholas Winding Refn’s Valhalla Rising, I now appreciate why it was received so well at film festivals and yet failed to get a wide theatrical release. It’s hard going. On one hand it’s almost unbearably brutal and on the other it is layered with the sort of mind-bending symbolic meaning that leads the viewer to the brink of utter confusion and leaves... Read more
08 Jul 2010
Almost any time we write anything about Neil Gaiman, you can be sure that someone will feel the need to post a comment “outing” the man as a Scientologist. While we have a fairly relaxed attitude to comments and will publish almost anything that contributes to an article, you won’t find many comments about Neil Gaiman’s alleged ties to the Church of Scientology published on this site. We simply... Read more
09 Dec 2007
After 25 years since its original release, a definitive version of Ridley Scott's science fiction masterwork Blade Runner, Blade Runner: The Final Cut, has arrived. So what exactly has changed? And is it worth all the fuss? After attending a recent screening I can report that there are significant differences, mainly improvements, between this new version and Ridley's first Director's Cut released... Read more
19 Oct 2011
After watching the pilot to Fox’s ambitious TV time travelling dinosaur fest called Terra Nova, I am praying that when I watch the next episode the entire cast gets eaten by dinosaurs (in fact, that hope is the only reason I’ll be able to sit through another one). The entire cast’s gruesome deaths at the hands of a frenzied T-Rex or a velociraptor having a bad day can’t come soon enough.... Read more
10 Mar 2012
I have a confession to make. I'm not proud of it, but there's no use trying to hide it any longer, the damage has already been done. I was an Apple fanatic. Hard core. Completely obsessed. I'm not proud of my behaviour. I have no real excuses. All I can say in my defense is that I have always been a gadget fan, so naturally I was ripe for the plucking. My psyche was compromised, wide open to the fruit... Read more
30 Jan 2012
If you own an iPhone 4S you may have impressed your friends (or perhaps not) with the built in, voice-driven personal assistant called Siri. You can ask it to book appointments, call people, search nearby restaurants, make calculations, and a great deal more. Most of the time it gets it right too. Now Siri has an Android rival called Evi, and if first impressions are anything to go by, it's an impressive... Read more
02 Aug 2011
Dan Simmons’ latest novel, Flashback (July 2011), is “[a] provocative novel set in a future that seems scarily possible,” proving “why Dan Simmons is one of our most exciting and versatile writers." So says the publicist anyway. Dan Simmons is one of our most exciting and versatile writers, but sadly Flashback doesn’t prove that. And yes, Flashback is a provocative novel, but it doesn’t... Read more
16 Oct 2007
Daren Aronofsky’s The Fountain is a movie that divides opinion. During its press screening at the 63rd Venice International Film Festival in September 2006 it was booed; at the public screening the following evening it received a 10 minute standing ovation. To get an idea of just how divided opinion is, take a look at Rotten Tomatoes, a website that rates movies based on published reviews. Of 181... Read more
25 Mar 2012
No movie release in 2011 was more misunderstood and unfairly maligned as a result of misunderstanding than Zack Snyder’s Sucker Punch. Odds are you’ll disagree with that statement. An indication of the movie’s reception by “audiences” (non-professional reviewers) and the critics can be found on Rotten Tomatoes, where audience approval is calculated to be 47%, and of the 196 critical reviews... Read more
05 Oct 2009
Science fiction authors have long been outcasts from the literary world, in some cases critics using the worst examples of the genre as ammunition against it. Unfortunately though, at times even science fiction authors themselves can turn on their own kind: "Science fiction is rockets, chemicals and talking squids in outer space,” mocked Margaret Atwood (The Guardian, 28 January 2009), one of her... Read more
Latest videos
![]() | ![]() |


















![Men In Black 3 Trailer 2 Official 2012 [1080 HD] - Will Smith, Tommy Lee Jones](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Y2r9AIfYcV8/0.jpg)



![Looper - Official Trailer [HD]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/UZyZWFYyxcU/0.jpg)

![Total Recall 2012 Official Trailer [HD]: Colin Farrell Recalls His Dangerous Past: ENTV](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/sWMhADqlPYg/0.jpg)



Re: Chronicles of Riddick 3: Dead Man Stalking - Science Fiction World
What, Riddick became Lord Marshall and now hes...
Re: Rotten Apple: the war on Google's Android - Science Fiction World
That will be the legacy of Steve "Palpatine"...
Re: GodMachine
Strange...but cool. Definitely not EFC related in any...
Re: Beyond the Wall: Exploring George R.R. Martin's A Song of Ice and Fire
I will definitely pre-order this one! Cannot wait...