New Star Trek movie an instant classic
- 10 May 2009
- John Howell
Although I had doubts that director J. J. Abrams could pull it off, even with all the positive reviews the new movie has been receiving, a third of the way into watching the new Star Trek movie any doubts I had were cast aside. Abrams’ revitalised Star Trek movie is an instant classic. Gone are the camp, cheesy elements that made the old Star Trek at times hard for a wider viewing public to respond to (especially all those deluded souls uninterested in science fiction) and in its place Abrams has crafted a spectacular production that captures the spirit of Gene Roddenberry’s original Star Trek television series from the 60s, while making it accessible to a wider, modern audience. From the sound and the costumes, to the ship’s design and lighting, there is little that Abrams has left untouched and unimproved.
Star Fleet Academy on Earth, the planet Vulcan, and the interiors of the Enterprise appear more believable and vivid than ever before. Gone is the endless techno babble that seemed to play such a large part of the later movies and TV series, in particular Star Trek: The Next Generation: “Remodulations”, “subatomic fluctuations” and "focused tachyon fields" are not inserted into the dialogue whenever there is a pause in the action (there’s a rumour that writers on The Next Generation and later series would add the tag "<tech>" to portions of the script where they needed jargon inserted).
As well as dispensing with pseudoscientific gibberish, Abrams has jettisoned the original theme music too. In its place is a wonderful new sound by Michael Giacchino. The rousing score lifts the movie to another level. I’ll be picking up the soundtrack soon. For fans of the original theme music, it does appear in the new movie, but only as the end credits roll.
The movie’s casting is spot on. The young Spock and Kirk, equally important and prominent, shine. Chris Pine’s portrayal of Kirk’s transition from a brash, directionless youth, to a stubborn and energetic Star Fleet graduate is excellent. As well as benefiting from a physical similarity to the original Spock, Zachary Quinto as the inexperienced and untested younger Spock is great, especially when he must come to terms with his half human, half Vulcan heritage. Which side will dominate? What side will he choose? Quinto is most famous for playing the sinister Syler in the science fiction TV show Heroes.
If the casting of Spock and Kirk is excellent, the casting of Karl Urban as Dr. Leonard McCoy (Bones) is superb. He captures the essence of the original actor, the late, great DeForest Kelley, while stealing every scene in which he appears. When Bones first meets Kirk on board a Federation shuttle, the exchange of dialogue is humorous, sharp and sets up his character perfectly. The only thing that really bugged me about his performance was that we didn’t see enough of it. He seemed to play a large role in the early stages of the movie but appeared all too briefly later. I guess with all the character introductions from Kirk to Spock, to Scotty, Uhura and beyond, there’s only so much screen time available. Hopefully this will be rectified in future movies.
Eric Bana as Nero, Zoe Saldana as Uhura, John Cho as Sulu, and Simon Pegg as Scotty were all good, although their performances never reached the heights of Kirk, Spock and Bones. As the villain of the piece, Nero’s motivations and character in particular appeared especially undercooked.
By far the most impressive achievement in the entire movie though, is Abrams’ ability to include a scene where Kirk goes to bed with a bright green-skinned alien woman and not have it appear totally silly (only mildly silly in this case).
The only real major failing of the new movie (and I grant you that some may see this as a critical one) is a script that loses its way half way through and appears at times held together by pieces of string easily cut. Without giving too much away, a series of convenient coincidences that introduce characters and move them from one place to another are at times highly implausible. When Kirk meets the original Spock (Leonard Nimoy) for the first time, for instance, or Scotty comes onto the scene and gives them an all too easy and convenient way to make their way back to the Enterprise, you get the feeling the writers were trying too hard to join the dots. If everything else hadn’t been working so well, it would have been hard to forgive these implausibilities.
Still, Paramount is sure to be pleased with this new movie and audiences too (I just heard it has already made 76.5 million in the US alone). The Star Trek characters of old have been reborn, re-energised, and the scene set beautifully for a series of future adventures and hopefully a new Star Trek TV show with J. J. Abrams’ at the helm. Everything old is new again.
J.J. Abrams surpassed almost everyone's expectations with th...
After a highly successful career in film and television, i...
The actors behind two of Star Trek's most recognisable chara...
Featured articles
09 Dec 2007
After 25 years since its original release, a definitive version of Ridley Scott's science fiction masterwork Blade Runner, Blade Runner: The Final Cut, has arrived. So what exactly has changed? And is it worth all the fuss? After attending a recent screening I can report that there are significant differences, mainly improvements, between this new version and Ridley's first Director's Cut released... Read more
30 Jan 2012
If you own an iPhone 4S you may have impressed your friends (or perhaps not) with the built in, voice-driven personal assistant called Siri. You can ask it to book appointments, call people, search nearby restaurants, make calculations, and a great deal more. Most of the time it gets it right too. Now Siri has an Android rival called Evi, and if first impressions are anything to go by, it's an impressive... Read more
08 Jul 2010
Almost any time we write anything about Neil Gaiman, you can be sure that someone will feel the need to post a comment “outing” the man as a Scientologist. While we have a fairly relaxed attitude to comments and will publish almost anything that contributes to an article, you won’t find many comments about Neil Gaiman’s alleged ties to the Church of Scientology published on this site. We simply... Read more
02 Aug 2011
Dan Simmons’ latest novel, Flashback (July 2011), is “[a] provocative novel set in a future that seems scarily possible,” proving “why Dan Simmons is one of our most exciting and versatile writers." So says the publicist anyway. Dan Simmons is one of our most exciting and versatile writers, but sadly Flashback doesn’t prove that. And yes, Flashback is a provocative novel, but it doesn’t... Read more
10 Mar 2012
I have a confession to make. I'm not proud of it, but there's no use trying to hide it any longer, the damage has already been done. I was an Apple fanatic. Hard core. Completely obsessed. I'm not proud of my behaviour. I have no real excuses. All I can say in my defense is that I have always been a gadget fan, so naturally I was ripe for the plucking. My psyche was compromised, wide open to the fruit... Read more
25 Mar 2012
No movie release in 2011 was more misunderstood and unfairly maligned as a result of misunderstanding than Zack Snyder’s Sucker Punch. Odds are you’ll disagree with that statement. An indication of the movie’s reception by “audiences” (non-professional reviewers) and the critics can be found on Rotten Tomatoes, where audience approval is calculated to be 47%, and of the 196 critical reviews... Read more
16 Oct 2007
Daren Aronofsky’s The Fountain is a movie that divides opinion. During its press screening at the 63rd Venice International Film Festival in September 2006 it was booed; at the public screening the following evening it received a 10 minute standing ovation. To get an idea of just how divided opinion is, take a look at Rotten Tomatoes, a website that rates movies based on published reviews. Of 181... Read more
05 Oct 2009
Science fiction authors have long been outcasts from the literary world, in some cases critics using the worst examples of the genre as ammunition against it. Unfortunately though, at times even science fiction authors themselves can turn on their own kind: "Science fiction is rockets, chemicals and talking squids in outer space,” mocked Margaret Atwood (The Guardian, 28 January 2009), one of her... Read more
07 Jun 2010
Finally having had the opportunity to watch Nicholas Winding Refn’s Valhalla Rising, I now appreciate why it was received so well at film festivals and yet failed to get a wide theatrical release. It’s hard going. On one hand it’s almost unbearably brutal and on the other it is layered with the sort of mind-bending symbolic meaning that leads the viewer to the brink of utter confusion and leaves... Read more
19 Oct 2011
After watching the pilot to Fox’s ambitious TV time travelling dinosaur fest called Terra Nova, I am praying that when I watch the next episode the entire cast gets eaten by dinosaurs (in fact, that hope is the only reason I’ll be able to sit through another one). The entire cast’s gruesome deaths at the hands of a frenzied T-Rex or a velociraptor having a bad day can’t come soon enough.... Read more
Latest videos
![]() | ![]() |




















![Anchorman 2: The Legend Continues [Official Teaser] HD (Will Ferrell, Steve Carell, Paul Rudd)](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/I0t1Ys3DfBE/0.jpg)



![Men In Black 3 Trailer 2 Official 2012 [1080 HD] - Will Smith, Tommy Lee Jones](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Y2r9AIfYcV8/0.jpg)



![Looper - Official Trailer [HD]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/UZyZWFYyxcU/0.jpg)

Re: Scott Bakula and Dean Stockwell to cameo in Quantum Leap movie
Some remakes are ok becausecof improvements in special...
Re: Chronicles of Riddick 3: Dead Man Stalking - Science Fiction World
What, Riddick became Lord Marshall and now hes...
Re: Rotten Apple: the war on Google's Android - Science Fiction World
That will be the legacy of Steve "Palpatine"...
Re: GodMachine
Strange...but cool. Definitely not EFC related in any...